Host a one-hour AI safety discussion
Pick one short reading, invite 4–8 people, and run a focused one-hour discussion with three good questions.
Gather 6–12 friends, give each a stakeholder role (lab, regulator, journalist, public) and play out how society responds to a fictional AI incident.
Tabletop exercises surface blind spots and objections that documents miss. They also work well as a society event.
Output: A scenario pack you can reuse, plus a summary of lessons.
Invent a plausible AI incident and three “injects” (new developments you reveal during the game). Keep it fictional and non-technical.
One card per stakeholder with goals, constraints and secret information.
Play in rounds: reveal an inject, let teams discuss, then each announces a decision. Keep time strictly.
Ask: what surprised you? Where did coordination fail? What rule would have helped?
Summarise the decisions and lessons, and share the scenario pack so others can run it.
All steps done
Share what you made, then try another project. The PDF version has room for notes.
Pick one short reading, invite 4–8 people, and run a focused one-hour discussion with three good questions.
AI could make institutions better or worse at reasoning and coordinating. Prototype one tool or evaluation from BlueDot’s decision-making hackathon or Forethought’s design sketches.
In Anthropic and CIP’s study, about 1,000 Americans used the open-source tool Polis to write a constitution for an AI. Run the same process with 30–100 students and compare your result with theirs.