PolicyA weekendIntermediateFree

Who pays when AI causes harm? A liability explainer

Explain how liability and insurance could shape AI companies’ behaviour, using one realistic harm scenario to make it concrete.

Download PDFReading & writing

Why it matters

If developers pay for the harms they cause, safety becomes a business priority. Few people outside law can explain how this would actually work.

Output: A 1,500-word explainer.

Getting started

0 of 5 done
  1. Pick a specific reader, such as a friend who is not into tech.

  2. Read 2–3 good sources and write the core idea in one sentence.

  3. Draft with one everyday example.

  4. Define every technical term, or remove it.

  5. Test it on a real reader, revise, and publish.

Related projects

Philosophy1–3 hoursGuided

Explain one safety idea to a friend

Write a short, jargon-free explainer of one AI safety idea (reward hacking, sycophancy, compute governance, DNA screening) for someone outside tech.

Reading & writingView project
Policy1–3 hoursGuided

Explain the EU AI Act’s risk levels

Summarise how the EU sorts AI systems by risk (banned, high-risk, transparency duties, minimal) with one everyday example for each level, plus what changes for general-purpose models.

Reading & writingVisualView project
Governance1–3 hoursGuided

Explain compute governance to a friend

Why do so many governance proposals focus on chips? Read one key paper and write a jargon-free explainer for someone outside tech.

Reading & writingView project

Further reading

Related mentored projects